Gary Winogrand claimed that every photograph is a battle
between form and content. If you expand ‘form’ to include print quality and
change ‘battle’ to ‘race’ then I really agree with this.
I’m big on content (see January 2010). That is not to say that I don’t spend a lot
of effort trying to make my prints sing.
I want it all. Sometimes I have
to accept that a print is only going to hum loudly. I just made one (above).
I really like this photograph – the content:
mom and daughter going off to a Paris
street market on a chilly Saturday. The form: not so much.
The negative is just a bit soft, depth of field is right
where I want it but the background/foreground contrast is low, it’s a grab shot
so there is a lot of extra background to be cropped off. After three head-banging sessions in the
darkroom I have declared victory at the “loud hum” level. That’s as good as it’s going to get.
One of my all-time favorites is by the great Willy Ronis –
“Merchands de frites, Rue Rambeteau, 1946”.
Two young women are behind the counter of a
sidewalk shop. The print is grainy, it’s
not very sharp, the skin tones are muddy on one face, it was obviously strained
out of a very soft negative. I suspect
that the tapestry of Ronis’ French profanity while he was printing it is still
hanging over Paris
somewhere. Would either of these prints
be ‘better’ if they were tack-sharp, if the subject/background separation was
more obvious, if the skin tones were opened up?
Beats me.
I try to keep Ronis’ print in mind when I am watching the
form versus content race. The best
outcome of the battle is a draw in which both win. Sometimes content wins and form is close
enough. Sometimes form wins (and the
print winds up in the recycle bin).